Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Modern Satanism)

The inverted pentagram circumscribed by a circle (also known as a pentacle) is often used to represent Satanism.

Satanism is a group of ideological and philosophical beliefs based on Satan. Although several historical precedents exist, the contemporary religious practice of Satanism began with the founding of the atheistic Church of Satan by Anton LaVey in the United States in 1966. Prior to that time, Satanism existed primarily as the subject of accusations by various Christian groups toward perceived ideological opponents rather than a self-identity or expressed religious belief. Satanism, and the concept of Satan, has also been used by artists and entertainers for symbolic expression.

Accusations of groups engaged in "devil worship" have echoed throughout much of Christian history. During the Middle Ages, the Inquisition led by the Catholic Church alleged that various heretical Christian sects and groups, such as the Knights Templar and the Cathars, performed secret Satanic rituals. In the subsequent Early Modern period, belief in a widespread Satanic conspiracy of witches resulted in mass trials of alleged witches across Europe and the North American colonies. Accusations that Satanic conspiracies were active, and behind events such as the development of Protestantism (and conversely, the Protestant claim that the Pope was the Antichrist) and the French Revolution continued to be made in Christendom between the 18th and 20th centuries. The idea of a vast Satanic conspiracy reached new heights with the influential Taxil hoax of France in the 1890s, which claimed that Freemasonry worshipped Satan, Lucifer, and/or Baphomet in their rituals. In the 1980s and 1990s, the Satanic ritual abuse hysteria spread through the United States and the United Kingdom amid fears that groups of Satanists were regularly sexually abusing and murdering children in their rites. No evidence was found against the accused; neither of being practitioners of a Satanic religion, nor guilty of the allegations leveled at them.

Since the 19th century, various small religious groups have emerged that identify as Satanist or use Satanic iconography. The Satanist groups that appeared after the 1960s are widely diverse but can be divided into theistic Satanism and atheistic Satanism.[1] Those venerating Satan as a supernatural deity view him not as omnipotent but rather as a patriarch. Atheistic Satanists regard Satan as a symbol of certain human traits but not ontologically real.[2] Since its founding in 2012, The Satanic Temple has attracted hundreds of thousands of nontheistic members worldwide.[3]

Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon; the ideas spreading elsewhere is an effect of globalization and the Internet.[4] The internet has allowed for intra-group communication and is also the main forum for Satanist disputes.[4] Satanism started to reach Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s—in time with the fall of the Communist Bloc—and most noticeably in Poland and Lithuania, predominantly Roman Catholic countries.[5][6]


Saint Wolfgang and the Devil, by Michael Pacher

In their study of Satanism, the religious studies scholars Asbjørn Dyrendal, James R. Lewis, and Jesper Aa. Petersen stated that the term Satanism "has a history of being a designation made by people against those whom they dislike; it is a term used for 'othering'".[7] The concept of Satanism is an invention of Christianity, for it relies upon the figure of Satan, a character deriving from Christian mythology.[8]

Elsewhere, Petersen noted that "Satanism as something others do is very different from Satanism as a self-designation".[9] Eugene Gallagher noted that, as commonly used, Satanism was usually "a polemical, not a descriptive term".[10]

In 1994, the Italian sociologist Massimo Introvigne suggested defining Satanism with the simultaneous presence of "1) the worship of the character identified with the name of Satan or Lucifer in the Bible, 2) by organized groups with at least a minimal organization and hierarchy, 3) through ritual or liturgical practices [...] it does not matter how each Satanist group perceives Satan, as personal or impersonal, real or symbolical".[11]


The word "Satan" was not originally a proper name, but rather an ordinary noun that means "adversary". In this context, it appears at several points in the Old Testament.[12] For instance, in the Book of Samuel, David is presented as the satan ("adversary") of the Philistines, while in the Book of Numbers, the term appears as a verb, when Jehovah sent an angel to satan ("to oppose") Balaam.[13] Prior to the composition of the New Testament, the idea developed within Jewish communities that Satan was the name of an angel who had rebelled against Jehovah and had been cast out of Heaven along with his followers; this account would be incorporated into contemporary texts like the Book of Enoch.[14] This Satan was then featured in parts of the New Testament, where he was presented as a figure who tempted humans to commit sin; in the Book of Matthew and the Book of Luke, he attempted to tempt Jesus of Nazareth as the latter fasted in the wilderness.[15]

The word "Satanism" was adopted into English from the French satanisme.[16] The terms "Satanism" and "Satanist" are first recorded as appearing in the English and French languages during the sixteenth century, when they were used by Christian groups to attack other, rival Christian groups.[17] In a Roman Catholic tract of 1565, the author condemns the "heresies, blasphemies, and sathanismes [sic]" of the Protestants.[16] In an Anglican work of 1559, Anabaptists and other Protestant sects are condemned as "swarmes of Satanistes [sic]".[16] As used in this manner, the term "Satanism" was not used to claim that people literally worshipped Satan, but rather, it claimed that the accused was deviating from true Christianity, and thus serving the will of Satan. [18] During the nineteenth century, the term "Satanism" began to be used to describe those considered to lead a broadly immoral lifestyle,[18] and it was only in the late nineteenth century that it came to be applied in English to individuals who were believed to consciously and deliberately venerate Satan.[18] This latter meaning had appeared earlier in the Swedish language; the Lutheran Bishop Laurentius Paulinus Gothus had described devil-worshipping sorcerers as Sathanister in his Ethica Christiana, produced between 1615 and 1630.[19]


Historical and anthropological research suggests that nearly all societies have developed the idea of a sinister and anti-human force that can hide itself within society.[20] This commonly involves a belief in witches, a group of individuals who invert the norms of their society and seek to harm their community, for instance by engaging in incest, murder, and cannibalism.[21] Allegations of witchcraft may have different causes and serve different functions within a society.[22] For instance, they may serve to uphold social norms,[23] to heighten the tension in existing conflicts between individuals,[23] or to scapegoat certain individuals for various social problems.[22]

Another contributing factor to the idea of Satanism is the concept that there is an agent of misfortune and evil who operates on a cosmic scale,[24] something usually associated with a strong form of ethical dualism that divides the world clearly into forces of good and forces of evil.[25] The earliest such entity known is Angra Mainyu, a figure that appears in the Persian religion of Zoroastrianism.[24][26] This concept was also embraced by Judaism and early Christianity, and although it was soon marginalized within Jewish thought, it gained increasing importance within early Christian understandings of the cosmos.[27] While the early Christian idea of the Devil was not well developed, it gradually adapted and expanded through the creation of folklore, art, theological treatises, and morality tales, thus providing the character with a range of extra-Biblical associations.[28]

Medieval and Early Modern Christendom

Title illustration of Johannes Praetorius (writer) Blocksbergs Verrichtung (1668) showing many traditional features of the medieval Witches' Sabbath

As Christianity expanded throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, it came into contact with a variety of other religions, which it regarded as "pagan". Christian theologians claimed that the gods and goddesses venerated by these "pagans" were not genuine divinities but were actually demons.[29] However, they did not believe that "pagans" were deliberately devil-worshippers, instead claiming that they were simply misguided.[30] In Christian iconography, the Devil and demons were given the physical traits of figures from classical mythology, such as the god Pan, fauns, and satyrs.[30]

Those Christian groups regarded as heretics by the Roman Catholic Church were treated differently, with theologians arguing that they were deliberately worshipping the Devil.[31] This was accompanied by claims that such individuals engaged in incestuous sexual orgies, murdered infants, and committed acts of cannibalism, all stock accusations that had previously been leveled at Christians themselves in the Roman Empire.[32]

The first recorded example of such an accusation being made within Western Christianity took place in Toulouse in 1022, when two clerics were tried for allegedly venerating a demon.[33] Throughout the Middle Ages, this accusation would be applied to a wide range of Christian heretical groups, including the Paulicians, Bogomils, Cathars, Waldensians, and the Hussites.[34] The Knights Templar were accused of worshipping an idol known as Baphomet, with Lucifer having appeared at their meetings in the form of a cat.[35] As well as these Christian groups, these claims were also made about Europe's Jewish community.[36] In the thirteenth century, there were also references made to a group of "Luciferians" led by a woman named Lucardis which hoped to see Satan rule in Heaven. References to this group continued into the fourteenth century, although historians studying the allegations concur that these Luciferians were likely a fictitious invention.[37]

Within Christian thought, the idea developed that certain individuals could make a pact with Satan.[38] This may have emerged after observing that pacts with gods and goddesses played a role in various pre-Christian belief systems, or that such pacts were also made as part of the Christian cult of saints.[39] Another possibility is that it derives from a misunderstanding of Augustine of Hippo's condemnation of augury in his On Christian Doctrine, written in the late fourth century. Here, he stated that people who consulted augurs were entering "quasi pacts" (covenants) with demons.[40] The idea of the diabolical pact made with demons was popularized across Europe in the story of Faust, likely based in part on the real life Johann Georg Faust.[41]

The Obscene Kiss, an illustration of witches kissing the Devil's anus from Francesco Maria Guazzo's Compendium Maleficarum (1608)

As the late medieval gave way to the early modern period, European Christendom experienced a schism between the established Roman Catholic Church and the breakaway Protestant movement. In the ensuing Reformation and Counter-Reformation, both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of deliberately being in league with Satan.[42] It was in this context that the terms "Satanist" and "Satanism" emerged.[17]

The early modern period also saw fear of Satanists reach its "historical apogee" in the form of the witch trials of the fifteenth to the eighteenth centuries.[43] This came about as the accusations which had been leveled at medieval heretics, among them that of devil-worship, were applied to the pre-existing idea of the witch, or practitioner of malevolent magic.[44] The idea of a conspiracy of Satanic witches was developed by educated elites, although the concept of malevolent witchcraft was a widespread part of popular belief and folkloric ideas about the night witch, the wild hunt, and the dance of the fairies were incorporated into it.[45] The earliest trials took place in Northern Italy and France, before spreading it out to other areas of Europe and to Britain's North American colonies, being carried out by the legal authorities in both Catholic and Protestant regions.[43] Between 30,000 and 50,000 individuals were executed as accused Satanic witches.[43] Most historians agree that the majority of those persecuted in these witch trials were innocent of any involvement in Devil worship.[46] However, in their summary of the evidence for the trials, the historians Geoffrey Scarre and John Callow thought it "without doubt" that some of those accused in the trials had been guilty of employing magic in an attempt to harm their enemies and were thus genuinely guilty of witchcraft.[47]

In seventeenth-century Sweden, a number of highway robbers and other outlaws living in the forests informed judges that they venerated Satan because he provided more practical assistance than Jehovah.[48] Introvigne regarded these practices as "folkloric Satanism".[19]

18th- to 20th-century Christendom

Stanislas de Guaita drew the original goat pentagram, which first appeared in the book La Clef de la Magie Noire in 1897. This symbol would later become synonymous with Baphomet, and is commonly referred to as the Sabbatic Goat.

During the eighteenth century, gentleman's social clubs became increasingly prominent in Britain and Ireland, among the most secretive of which were the Hellfire Clubs, which were first reported in the 1720s.[49] The most famous of these groups was the Order of the Knights of Saint Francis, which was founded circa 1750 by the aristocrat Sir Francis Dashwood and which assembled first at his estate at West Wycombe and later in Medmenham Abbey.[50] A number of contemporary press sources portrayed these as gatherings of atheist rakes where Christianity was mocked, and toasts were made to the Devil.[51] Beyond these sensationalist accounts, which may not be accurate portrayals of actual events, little is known about the activities of the Hellfire Clubs.[51] Introvigne suggested that they may have engaged in a form of "playful Satanism" in which Satan was invoked "to show a daring contempt for conventional morality" by individuals who neither believed in his literal existence nor wanted to pay homage to him.[52]

The French Revolution of 1789 dealt a blow to the hegemony of the Roman Catholic Church in parts of Europe, and soon a number of Catholic authors began making claims that it had been masterminded by a conspiratorial group of Satanists.[53] Among the first to do so was French Catholic priest Jean-Baptiste Fiard, who publicly claimed that a wide range of individuals, from the Jacobins to tarot card readers, were part of a Satanic conspiracy.[54] Fiard's ideas were furthered by Alexis-Vincent-Charles Berbiguier, who devoted a lengthy book to this conspiracy theory; he claimed that Satanists had supernatural powers allowing them to curse people and to shapeshift into both cats and fleas.[55] Although most of his contemporaries regarded Berbiguier as mad,[56] his ideas gained credence among many occultists, including Stanislas de Guaita, a Cabalist who used them for the basis of his book, The Temple of Satan.[57]

In the early 20th century, the British novelist Dennis Wheatley produced a range of influential novels in which his protagonists battled Satanic groups.[58] At the same time, non-fiction authors like Montague Summers and Rollo Ahmed published books claiming that Satanic groups practicing black magic were still active across the world, although they provided no evidence that this was the case.[59] During the 1950s, various British tabloid newspapers repeated such claims, largely basing their accounts on the allegations of one woman, Sarah Jackson, who claimed to have been a member of such a group.[60] In 1973, the British Christian Doreen Irvine published From Witchcraft to Christ, in which she claimed to have been a member of a Satanic group that gave her supernatural powers, such as the ability to levitate, before she escaped and embraced Christianity.[61]

In the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, various Christian preachers—the most famous being Mike Warnke in his 1972 book The Satan-Seller—claimed that they had been members of Satanic groups who carried out sex rituals and animal sacrifices before discovering Christianity.[62] According to Gareth Medway in his historical examination of Satanism, these stories were "a series of inventions by insecure people and hack writers, each one based on a previous story, exaggerated a little more each time".[63]

Other publications made allegations of Satanism against historical figures. The 1970s saw the publication of the Romanian Protestant preacher Richard Wurmbrand's book in which he argued—without corroborating evidence—that the socio-political theorist Karl Marx had been a Satanist.[64]

Modern Satanism

The Sabbatic Goat, also known as the Goat of Mendes or Baphomet, as illustrated by Éliphas Lévi, has become one of the most common symbols of Satanism.[65]

The figure of "Lucifer" was taken up by the French ceremonial magician Éliphas Lévi, who has been described as a "Romantic Satanist".[66] During his younger days, Lévi used "Lucifer" in the same positive symbolic manner as the literary Romantics.[67] As he moved toward political conservatism in later life, he retained the use of the term, but instead applied it to what he believed was a morally neutral facet of "the absolute".[66][67]

Lévi was not the only occultist who used the term "Lucifer" without adopting the term "Satan" in a similar way.[67] The early Theosophical Society believed that "Lucifer" was a force that aided humanity's awakening to its own spiritual nature.[68] In keeping with this belief, the Society began production of the journal Lucifer in 1887.[69]

Some historians have claimed English writers Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley to be among the first Satanists[70][71] but others believe they simply portrayed him positively without actually venerating him.[72] The first person to promote an explicitly "Satanic" philosophy was the Polish writer Stanisław Przybyszewski, who based his ideology on Social Darwinism of the 1890s.[73]

"Lucifer" also figured within the esoteric system propounded by the Danish occultist Carl William Hansen, who used the pen name "Ben Kadosh".[69] Hansen was involved in a variety of esoteric groups, including Martinism, Freemasonry, and the Ordo Templi Orientis, drawing on their ideas to establish his own philosophy.[69] He provided a Luciferian interpretation of Freemasonry in a 1906 pamphlet,[74] though his work had little influence outside of Denmark.[74][75]

Aleister Crowley was not a Satanist, but used rhetoric and imagery considered satanic.

Both during his life and after it, the British occultist Aleister Crowley has been widely described as a Satanist, usually by detractors. Crowley stated he did not consider himself a Satanist, nor did he worship Satan, as he did not accept the Christian world view in which Satan was believed to exist.[76] He nevertheless used imagery considered satanic, for instance by describing himself as "the Beast 666" and referring to the Whore of Babylon in his work, while in later life he sent "Antichristmas cards" to his friends.[77] Dyrendel, Lewis, and Petersen noted that despite the fact that Crowley was not a Satanist, he "in many ways embodies the pre-Satanist esoteric discourse on Satan and Satanism through his lifestyle and his philosophy", with his "image and thought" becoming an "important influence" on the later development of religious Satanism.[74]

In 1928, the Fraternitas Saturni (FS) was established in Germany; its founder, Eugen Grosche, published Satanische Magie ("Satanic Magic") that same year.[78] The group connected Satan to Saturn, claiming that the planet related to the Sun in the same manner that Lucifer relates to the human world.[78]

In 1932, an esoteric group known as the Brotherhood of the Golden Arrow was established in Paris, France, by Maria de Naglowska, a Russian occultist who had fled to France following the Russian Revolution.[79][80] She promoted a theology centered on what she called the Third Term of the Trinity consisting of Father, Son, and Sex, the last of which she deemed to be most important.[79] Her early disciples, who underwent what she called "Satanic Initiations", included models and art students recruited from bohemian circles.[79] The Golden Arrow disbanded after Naglowska abandoned it in 1936.[81] According to Introvigne, hers was "a quite complicated Satanism, built on a complex philosophical vision of the world, of which little would survive its initiator".[82]

In 1969, a Satanic group based in Toledo, Ohio, part of the United States, came to public attention. Called the Our Lady of Endor Coven, it was led by a man named Herbert Sloane, who described his Satanic tradition as the Ophite Cultus Sathanas and alleged that it had been established in the 1940s.[83][84] The group had a Gnostic doctrine about the world, in which the Judeo-Christian creator god is regarded as evil, and the Biblical serpent is presented as a force for good, who had delivered salvation to humanity in the Garden of Eden.[83][85] Sloane's claims that his group had a 1940s origin remain unproven; it may be that he falsely claimed older origins for his group to make it appear older than Anton LaVey's Church of Satan, which had been established in 1966.[86][84]

None of these groups had any real impact on the emergence of the later Satanic milieu in the 1960s.[87]

Ritual abuse hysteria

At the end of the twentieth century, a moral panic arose from claims that a Devil-worshipping cult was committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism in its rituals, and including children among the victims of its rites.[88] Initially, the alleged perpetrators of such crimes were labeled "witches", although the term "Satanist" was soon adopted as a favored alternative,[88] and the phenomenon itself came to be called "the Satanism Scare".[89] Promoters of the claims alleged that there was a conspiracy of organized Satanists who occupied prominent positions throughout society, from the police to politicians, and that they had been powerful enough to cover up their crimes.[90]

Preceded by some significant but isolated episodes in the 1970s, a great Satanism scare exploded in the 1980s in the United States and Canada and was subsequently exported towards England, Australia, and other countries. It was unprecedented in history. It surpassed even the results of Taxil's propaganda, and has been compared with the most virulent periods of witch hunting. The scare started in 1980 and declined slowly between 1990... and 1994, when official British and American reports denied the real existence of ritual satanic crimes. Particularly outside the U.S. and U.K., however, its consequences are still felt today.

Sociologist of religion Massimo Introvigne, 2016[91]

One of the primary sources for the scare was Michelle Remembers, a 1980 book by the Canadian psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder in which he detailed what he claimed were the repressed memories of his patient (and wife) Michelle Smith. Smith had claimed that as a child she had been abused by her family in Satanic rituals in which babies were sacrificed and Satan himself appeared.[92][93] In 1983, allegations were made that the McMartin family—owners of a preschool in California—were guilty of sexually abusing the children in their care during Satanic rituals. The allegations resulted in a lengthy and expensive trial, in which all of the accused would eventually be cleared.[94][95] The publicity generated by the case resulted in similar allegations being made in various other parts of the United States.[96]

A prominent aspect of the Satanic Scare was the claim by those in the developing "anti-Satanism" movement that any child's claim about Satanic ritual abuse must be true, because children would not lie.[97] Although some involved in the anti-Satanism movement were from Jewish and secular backgrounds,[98] a central part was played by fundamentalist and evangelical forms of Christianity, in particular Pentecostalism, with Christian groups holding conferences and producing books and videotapes to promote belief in the conspiracy.[89] Various figures in law enforcement also came to be promoters of the conspiracy theory, with such "cult cops" holding various conferences to promote it.[99] The scare was later imported to the United Kingdom through visiting evangelicals and became popular among some of the country's social workers,[100] resulting in a range of accusations and trials across Britain.[101]

The Satanic ritual abuse hysteria died down between 1990 and 1994.[91] In the late 1980s, the Satanic Scare had lost its impetus following increasing skepticism about such allegations,[102] and a number of those who had been convicted of perpetrating Satanic ritual abuse saw their convictions overturned.[103] In 1990, an agent of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Ken Lanning, revealed that he had investigated 300 allegations of Satanic ritual abuse and found no evidence for Satanism or ritualistic activity in any of them.[103] In the UK, the Department of Health commissioned the anthropologist Jean La Fontaine to examine the allegations of SRA.[104] She noted that while approximately half did reveal evidence of genuine sexual abuse of children, none revealed any evidence that Satanist groups had been involved or that any murders had taken place.[105] She noted three examples in which lone individuals engaged in child molestation had created a ritual performance to facilitate their sexual acts, with the intent of frightening their victims and justifying their actions, but that none of these child molesters were involved in wider Satanist groups.[106] By the 21st century, hysteria about Satanism has waned in most Western countries, although allegations of Satanic ritual abuse continued to surface in parts of continental Europe and Latin America.[107]

Atheistic Satanism

Church of Satan

The Sigil of Baphomet, the official insignia of the Church of Satan and LaVeyan Satanism

Anton LaVey, who has been referred to as "The Father of Satanism",[108] synthesized his religion through the establishment of the Church of Satan in 1966 and the publication of The Satanic Bible in 1969. LaVey's teachings promoted "indulgence", "vital existence", "undefiled wisdom", "kindness to those who deserve it", "responsibility to the responsible", and an "eye for an eye" code of ethics, while shunning "abstinence" based on guilt, "spirituality", "unconditional love", "pacifism", "equality", "herd mentality", and "scapegoating". LaVey envisioned a Satanist as a carnal, physical, and pragmatic being. The core values of LaVeyan Satanism are the enjoyment of physical existence, and undiluted naturalism that sees mankind as animals that exist in an amoral universe.

LaVey believed that the ideal Satanist should be individualistic and non-conformist, rejecting what he called the "colorless existence" that mainstream society sought to impose on those living within it.[109] He praised the human ego for encouraging an individual's pride, self-respect, and self-realization and accordingly believed in satisfying the ego's desires.[110] He stated that self-indulgence was a desirable trait,[111] and that hate, and aggression were not wrong or undesirable emotions but that they were necessary and advantageous for survival.[112] Accordingly, he praised the seven deadly sins as virtues which were beneficial for the individual.[113] The anthropologist Jean La Fontaine highlighted an article that appeared in The Black Flame, in which one writer described "a true Satanic society" as one in which the population consists of "free-spirited, well-armed, fully-conscious, self-disciplined individuals, who will neither need nor tolerate any external entity 'protecting' them or telling them what they can and cannot do."[114]

The sociologist James R. Lewis noted that "LaVey was directly responsible for the genesis of Satanism as a serious religious (as opposed to a purely literary) movement".[115] Scholars agree that there is no reliably documented case of Satanic continuity prior to the founding of the Church of Satan.[116] It was the first organized church in modern times to be devoted to the figure of Satan,[117] and according to Faxneld and Petersen, the Church represented "the first public, highly visible, and long-lasting organization which propounded a coherent satanic discourse".[118] LaVey's book, The Satanic Bible, has been described as the most important document to influence contemporary Satanism.[119] The book contains the core principles of Satanism and is considered the foundation of its philosophy and dogma.[120] Petersen noted that it is "in many ways the central text of the Satanic milieu",[121] with Lap similarly testifying to its dominant position within the wider Satanic movement.[122] David G. Bromley calls it "iconoclastic" and "the best-known and most influential statement of Satanic theology."[123] Eugene V. Gallagher says that Satanists use LaVey's writings "as lenses through which they view themselves, their group, and the cosmos." He also states: "With a clear-eyed appreciation of true human nature, a love of ritual and pageantry, and a flair for mockery, LaVey's Satanic Bible promulgated a gospel of self-indulgence that, he argued, anyone who dispassionately considered the facts would embrace."[124]

A number of religious studies scholars have described LaVey's Satanism as a form of "self-religion" or "self-spirituality",[125] with religious studies scholar Amina Olander Lap arguing that it should be seen as being both part of the "prosperity wing" of the self-spirituality New Age movement and a form of the Human Potential Movement.[126] The anthropologist Jean La Fontaine described it as having "both elitist and anarchist elements", also citing one occult bookshop owner who referred to the Church's approach as "anarchistic hedonism".[127] In The Invention of Satanism, Dyrendal and Petersen theorized that LaVey viewed his religion as "an antinomian self-religion for productive misfits, with a cynically carnivalesque take on life, and no supernaturalism".[128] The sociologist of religion James R. Lewis even described LaVeyan Satanism as "a blend of Epicureanism and Ayn Rand's philosophy, flavored with a pinch of ritual magic."[129] The historian of religion Mattias Gardell described LaVey's as "a rational ideology of egoistic hedonism and self-preservation",[130] while Nevill Drury characterized LaVeyan Satanism as "a religion of self-indulgence".[131] It has also been described as an "institutionalism of Machiavellian self-interest".[132]

Prominent Church leader Blanche Barton described Satanism as "an alignment, a lifestyle".[133] LaVey and the Church stated that "Satanists are born, not made";[134] that they are outsiders by their nature, living as they see fit,[109] who are self-realized in a religion which appeals to the would-be Satanist's nature, leading them to realize they are Satanists through finding a belief system that is in line with their own perspective and lifestyle.[135] Adherents to the philosophy have described Satanism as a non-spiritual religion of the flesh, or "...the world's first carnal religion".[136] LaVey used Christianity as a negative mirror for his new faith,[137] with LaVeyan Satanism rejecting the basic principles and theology of Christian belief.[127] It views Christianity – alongside other major religions, and philosophies such as humanism and liberal democracy – as a largely negative force on humanity; LaVeyan Satanists perceive Christianity as a lie which promotes idealism, self-denigration, herd behavior, and irrationality.[138] LaVeyans view their religion as a force for redressing this balance by encouraging materialism, egoism, stratification, carnality, atheism, and social Darwinism.[138] LaVey's Satanism was particularly critical of what it understands as Christianity's denial of humanity's animal nature, and it instead calls for the celebration of, and indulgence in, these desires.[127] In doing so, it places an emphasis on the carnal rather than the spiritual.[139]

Practitioners do not believe that Satan literally exists and do not worship him.[1] Instead, Satan is viewed as a positive archetype embracing the Hebrew root of the word "Satan" as "adversary", who represents pride, carnality, and enlightenment, and of a cosmos which Satanists perceive to be motivated by a "dark evolutionary force of entropy that permeates all of nature and provides the drive for survival and propagation inherent in all living things".[140] The Devil is embraced as a symbol of defiance against the Abrahamic faiths which LaVey criticized for what he saw as the suppression of humanity's natural instincts. Moreover, Satan also serves as a metaphorical external projection of the individual's godhood. LaVey stated that "god" is a creation of man, rather than man being a creation of "god". In his book, The Satanic Bible, the Satanist's concept of a god is described as the Satanist's true "self"— a projection of his or her own personality, not an external deity.[141] Satan is used as a representation of personal liberty and individualism.[142]

LaVey explained that the gods worshipped by other religions are also projections of man's true self. He argues that man's unwillingness to accept his own ego has caused him to externalize these gods so as to avoid the feeling of narcissism that would accompany self-worship.[143] The current high priest of the Church of Satan, Peter H. Gilmore, further expounds that "...Satan is a symbol of Man living as his prideful, carnal nature dictates [...] Satan is not a conscious entity to be worshipped, rather a reservoir of power inside each human to be tapped at will.[144] The Church of Satan has chosen Satan as its primary symbol because in Hebrew it means adversary, opposer, one to accuse or question. We see ourselves as being these Satans; the adversaries, opposers and accusers of all spiritual belief systems that would try to hamper enjoyment of our life as a human being."[145] The term "theistic Satanism" has been described as "oxymoronic" by the church and its High Priest.[146] The Church of Satan rejects the legitimacy of any other organizations who claim to be Satanists, dubbing them reverse-Christians, pseudo-Satanists or Devil worshipers, atheistic or otherwise,[147] and maintains a purist approach to Satanism as expounded by LaVey.[117]

First Satanic Church

After LaVey's death in 1997, the Church of Satan was taken over by a new administration and its headquarters were moved to New York. LaVey's daughter, the High Priestess Karla LaVey, felt this to be a disservice to her father's legacy. The First Satanic Church was re-founded on October 31, 1999, by Karla LaVey to carry on the legacy of her father. She continues to run it out of San Francisco, California.

The Satanic Temple

The Satanic Temple is an American religious and political activist organization based in Salem, Massachusetts. The organization actively participates in public affairs that have manifested in several public political actions[148][149] and efforts at lobbying,[150] with a focus on the separation of church and state and using satire against Christian groups that it believes interfere with personal freedom.[150] According to Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen, the group were "rationalist, political pranksters".[151] Their pranks are designed to highlight religious hypocrisy and advance the cause of secularism.[152] In one of their actions, they performed a "Pink Mass" over the grave of the mother of the evangelical Christian and prominent anti-LGBT preacher Fred Phelps; the Temple claimed that the mass converted the spirit of Phelps' mother into a lesbian.[151]

The Satanic Temple does not believe in a supernatural Satan, as they believe that this encourages superstition that would keep them from being "malleable to the best current scientific understandings of the material world". The Temple uses the literary Satan as metaphor to construct a cultural narrative which promotes pragmatic skepticism, rational reciprocity, personal autonomy, and curiosity.[153] Satan is thus used as a symbol representing "the eternal rebel" against arbitrary authority and social norms.[154][155]

Theistic Satanism

Religious Satanism does not exist in a single form, as there are multiple different religious Satanisms, each with different ideas about what being a Satanist entails.[156] A minority of Satanists are far-right.[157] The historian of religion Ruben van Luijk used a "working definition" in which Satanism was regarded as "the intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan".[18]

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen believed that it was not a single movement, but rather a milieu.[158] They and others have nevertheless referred to it as a new religious movement.[159] They believed that there was a family resemblance that united all of the varying groups in this milieu,[7] and that most of them were self religions.[158] They argued that there were a set of features that were common to the groups in this Satanic milieu: these were the positive use of the term "Satanist" as a designation, an emphasis on individualism, a genealogy that connects them to other Satanic groups, a transgressive and antinomian stance, a self-perception as an elite, and an embrace of values such as pride, self-reliance, and productive non-conformity.[160]

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen argued that the groups within the Satanic milieu could be divided into three groups: reactive Satanists, rationalist Satanists, and esoteric Satanists.[161] They saw reactive Satanism as encompassing "popular Satanism, inverted Christianity, and symbolic rebellion" and noted that it situates itself in opposition to society while at the same time conforming to society's perspective of evil.[161] Rationalist Satanism is used to describe the trend in the Satanic milieu which is atheistic, skeptical, materialistic, and epicurean.[162] Esoteric Satanism instead applied to those forms which are theistic and draw upon ideas from other forms of Western esotericism, Modern Paganism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.[162]

Theistic Satanism (also known as traditional Satanism, Spiritual Satanism or Devil worship) is a form of Satanism with the primary belief that Satan is an actual deity or force to revere or worship.[1][163] Other characteristics of theistic Satanism may include a belief in magic, which is manipulated through ritual, although that is not a defining criterion, and theistic Satanists may focus solely on devotion.


A version of the symbol of Lucifer, used by some modern Satanists

Luciferianism is a belief system that venerates the characteristics that are attributed to Lucifer. Luciferians usually revere Lucifer not as the devil, but as a destroyer, guardian, liberator,[164] light bringer, and/or guiding spirit to darkness,[165] or even as the true god, as opposed to Jehovah.[164] One group of Luciferians- those of the Neo-Luciferian Church, are influenced by Gnosticism.

Order of Nine Angles

One of the principal symbols of the ONA

According to the group's own claims, the Order of Nine Angles was established in Shropshire, England, during the late 1960s, when a Grand Mistress united a number of ancient pagan groups active in the area.[166] This account states that when the Order's Grand Mistress migrated to Australia, a man known as "Anton Long" took over as the new Grand Master.[166] From 1976 onward, he authored an array of texts for the tradition, codifying and extending its teachings, mythos, and structure.[167] Various academics have argued that Long is the pseudonym of British National Socialist Movement activist David Myatt,[168] an allegation that Myatt has denied.[169] The ONA arose to public attention in the early 1980s,[170] spreading its message through magazine articles over the following two decades.[171] In 2000, it established a presence on the internet,[171] later adopting social media to promote its message.[172]

The ONA is a secretive organization,[173] and lacks any central administration, instead operating as a network of allied Satanic practitioners, which it terms the "kollective".[174] It consists largely of autonomous cells known as "nexions".[174] The majority of these are located in Britain, Ireland, and Germany, although others are located elsewhere in Europe, and in Russia, Egypt, South Africa, Brazil, Australia, and the United States.[174]

The ONA describe their occultism as "Traditional Satanism".[175] The ONA's writings encourage human sacrifice,[176] referring to their victims as opfers.[177] According to the Order's teachings, such opfers must demonstrate character faults that mark them out as being worthy of death.[178][179] No ONA cell has admitted to carrying out a sacrifice in a ritualized manner, but rather, Order members have joined the police and military in order to carry out such killings.[180] Faxneld described the Order as "a dangerous and extreme form of Satanism",[181] while religious studies scholar Graham Harvey wrote that the ONA fit the stereotype of the Satanist "better than other groups" by embracing "deeply shocking" and illegal acts.[182] The ONA is connected to multiple killings, rapes, and cases of child abuse and right-wing terrorism. Several British politicians, including the Labour Party's Yvette Cooper, chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee,[183] have pushed for the group to be banned as a terror organization, and according to the BBC News, "the authorities are concerned by the number of paedophiles associated with the ONA". Additionally, there are various followers of the O9A paradigm who are (or were) also members of banned militant national-socialist groups, namely the Atomwaffen Division, Combat 18, and Nordic Resistance Movement, the first of which even openly aims to perpetrate terror attacks.[184][185][186]

Temple of Set

The Temple of Set is an initiatory occult society that claims to be the world's leading left-hand path religious organization. It was established in 1975 by Michael A. Aquino and certain members of the priesthood of the Church of Satan,[187] who left the CoS because of administrative and philosophical disagreements. ToS deliberately self-differentiates from CoS in several ways, most significantly in theology and sociology.[188] The philosophy of the Temple of Set may be summed up as "enlightened individualism"— enhancement and improvement of oneself by personal education, experiment, and initiation. This process is necessarily different and distinctive for each individual. The members do not agree on whether Set is real or symbolic, and they're not expected to.[188]

Michael Aquino believed that the name Satan was originally a corruption of the name Set.[189] The Temple teaches that Set is a real entity,[190] and the only real god in existence, with all other gods being created by the human imagination.[191] Set is described as having given humanity —through the means of non-natural evolution— the "Black Flame" or the "Gift of Set", which is a questioning intellect that sets humans apart from other animals.[192] While Setians are expected to revere Set, they do not worship him.[193] Central to Setian philosophy is the human individual,[137] with self-deification presented as the ultimate goal.[194]

In 2005, Petersen noted that academic estimates for the Temple's membership varied from between 300 and 500,[195] and Granholm suggested that in 2007, the Temple contained circa 200 members.[196]

Joy of Satan

Joy of Satan is a website and esoteric occult group that was founded in the early 2000s by Maxine Dietrich (pseudonym of Andrea Maxine Dietrich),[197][198][199] wife of the American National Socialist Movement's co-founder and former leader Clifford Herrington.[200] With its inception, spiritual Satanism was born – a current that until recently was regarded only as "theist", but then defined into "spiritual Satanism" by Theistic Satanists who concluded that the term "spiritual" in Satanism represented the best answer to the world,[201] considering it a "moral slap" toward the earlier carnal and materialistic LaVeyan Satanism, and instead focusing its attention upon spiritual evolution.[201] Joy of Satan presents a unique synthesis of theistic Satanism, Nazism, Gnosticism, Paganism, Western esotericism, UFO conspiracy theories, and extraterrestrial hypotheses similar to those popularized by Zecharia Sitchin and David Icke.[198][199]

Members of Joy of Satan are generally polytheists, believing that Satan is one of many deities.[198][202][203] While Satan and demons are considered deities within JoS, the deities themselves are understood to be highly evolved, un-aging, sentient, and powerful humanoid extraterrestrial beings.[198][202][200][204][205] Satan and many demons are equated with gods from ancient cultures, some of which include the Sumerian god Enki, and the Yazidi angel Melek Taus being seen as Satan, borrowing their theistic Satanist interpretations of Enki from the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, and Melek Taus partially deriving from the writings of Anton LaVey.[200] Satan is seen not only as an important deity but a powerful and sentient being responsible for the creation of humanity.[202][200] Satan is also revered by JoS as "the true father and creator god of humanity",[203] the bringer of knowledge, and whose desire is for his creations, humans, to elevate themselves through knowledge and understanding.[202][203]

In their beliefs, Yazidism is in juxtaposition with Satanism as they consider the two share similar elements, such as Yazidi devotees being defined by Muslims as "devotees to Shaytan" and regarded as Satanists.[201] It is also believed that the figure of Melek Taus, the peacock angel, may derive from much older pagan deities, such as Saraswati, the Hindu goddess of wisdom who rides a peacock, or even the god Indra, who transforms into a peacock.[201] The story of Melek Taus itself is also considered by JoS to have many satanic elements, such as being described as the angel who rebelled against the Abrahamic god.[201] The sacred text of the Yazidis, the Al-Jilwah, is claimed by the JoS as the word of Satan.[201]

While maintaining some popularity as a Theistic Satanist sect, the group has been widely criticized for its association with the National Socialist Movement and its racial anti-Jewish, anti-Judaic, and anti-Christian sentiment, as well as its anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.[204][206] Much of their beliefs on aliens, meditation, and telepathic contacts with demons have become popular in a larger milieu within the currents of recent non-LaVeyan theistic Satanism.[198][200] According to Petersen's survey (2014), Joy of Satan's angelfire network has a surprising prominence among theistic Satanist websites on the internet.[207] In addition, James R. Lewis's "Satan census" (2009) also revealed a presence of respondents to Joy of Satan.[208]

Personal Satanism

The American serial killer Richard Ramirez self-identified as a Satanist.

In contrast to the organized and doctrinal Satanist groups is the personal Satanism of individuals, who identify as Satanists due to their affinity for the general idea of Satan, including such characteristics as viciousness and/or subversion.

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen used the term "reactive Satanism" to describe one form of modern Satanism. They described this as an adolescent and anti-social means of rebelling in a Christian society, by which an individual transgresses cultural boundaries.[161] They believed that there were two tendencies within reactive Satanism: one, "Satanic tourism", was characterized by the brief period of time in which an individual was involved, while the other, the "Satanic quest", was typified by a longer and deeper involvement.[162]

The researcher Gareth Medway noted that in 1995 he encountered a British woman who stated that she had been a practicing Satanist during her teenage years. She had grown up in a small mining village and had come to believe that she had psychic powers. After hearing about Satanism in some library books, she declared herself a Satanist and formulated a belief that Satan was the true god. After her teenage years she abandoned Satanism and became a chaos magickian.[209]

Some personal Satanists are teenagers or mentally disturbed individuals who have engaged in criminal activities.[210] During the 1980s and 1990s, several groups of teenagers were apprehended after sacrificing animals and vandalizing both churches and graveyards with Satanic imagery.[211] Introvigne stated that these incidents were "more a product of juvenile deviance and marginalization than Satanism".[211] In a few cases, the crimes of these personal Satanists have included murder. In 1970, two separate groups of teenagers— one led by Stanley Baker in Big Sur, and the other by Steven Hurd in Los Angeles, killed a total of three people and consumed parts of their corpses in what they later claimed were sacrifices devoted to Satan.[212] The American serial killer Richard Ramirez for instance claimed that he was a (theistic) Satanist; during his 1980s killing spree he left an inverted pentagram at the scene of each murder and at his trial called out "Hail Satan!"[213] In 1984 on Long Island, a group allegedly called the Knights of the Black Circle killed one of its own members, Gary Lauwers, over a disagreement regarding the group's illegal drug dealing; group members later related that Lauwers' death was a sacrifice to Satan.[212] In particular, self-declared Satanist and alleged member of the Knights of the Black Circle, Ricky "the Acid King" Kasso, became notorious for torturing and murdering Lauwers while attempting to force Lauwers to declare "I love Satan" during the murder.[214] On November 21, 1998, Jarno Elg, a Finnish Satanist, was sentenced to life in prison for murdering a 23-year-old man in Hyvinkää, Finland, eating some of the body parts and instigating others to participate in a ritual that included torturing the victim.[215] Nikolai Ogolobyak, who confessed to being a member of a Satanic cult, was sentenced to 20 years in 2010 for the ritual killing of four teenagers in Russia's Yaroslavl region.[216]


A survey in the Encyclopedia of Satanism found that people became involved with Satanism in many diverse ways and were found in many countries. The survey found that more Satanists were raised as Protestant Christians than Catholic.[217]

Beginning in the late 1960s, organized Satanism emerged out of the occult subculture with the formation of the Church of Satan. It was not long, however, before Satanism had expanded well beyond the Church of Satan. The decentralization of the Satanist movement was considerably accelerated when Anton LaVey disbanded the grotto system in the mid-1970s. At present, religious Satanism exists primarily as a decentralized subculture [...] Unlike traditional religions, and even unlike the early Satanist bodies such as the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set, contemporary Satanism is, for the most part, a decentralized movement. In the past, this movement has been propagated through the medium of certain popular books, especially LaVey's Satanic Bible. In more recent years, the internet has come to play a significant role in reaching potential "converts", particularly among disaffected young people.

— Religion scholar and researcher of new religious movements James R. Lewis[218]

Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen observed that from surveys of Satanists conducted in the early 21st century, it was clear that the Satanic milieu was "heavily dominated by young males".[219] They nevertheless noted that census data from New Zealand suggested that there may be a growing proportion of women becoming Satanists.[219] In comprising more men than women, Satanism differs from most other religious communities, including most new religious communities.[220] Most Satanists came to their religion through reading, either online or books, rather than through being introduced to it through personal contacts.[221] Many practitioners do not claim that they converted to Satanism, but rather state that they were born that way, and only later in life confirmed that Satanism served as an appropriate label for their pre-existing worldviews.[222] Others have stated that they had experiences with supernatural phenomena that led them to embracing Satanism.[223] A number of Satanists reported anger toward some practicing Christians and said that the monotheistic gods of Christianity and other religions are unethical, citing issues such as the problem of evil.[224] For some practitioners, Satanism gave a sense of hope, even for those who had been physically and sexually abused.[225]

The surveys revealed that atheistic Satanists appeared to be in the majority, although the numbers of theistic Satanists appeared to grow over time.[218][226][227] Beliefs in the afterlife varied, although the most common beliefs about the afterlife were reincarnation and the idea that consciousness survives bodily death.[228] The surveys also demonstrated that most recorded Satanists practiced magic,[229] although there were differing opinions as to whether magical acts operated according to etheric laws or whether the effect of magic was purely psychological.[230] A number of Satanists described performing cursing, in most cases as a form of vigilante justice.[231] Most practitioners conduct their religious observances in a solitary manner, and never or rarely meet fellow Satanists for rituals.[232] Rather, the primary interaction that takes place between Satanists is online, on websites or via email.[233] From their survey data, Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen noted that the average length of involvement in the Satanic milieu was seven years.[234] A Satanist's involvement in the movement tends to peak in their early twenties and drops off sharply in their thirties.[235] A small proportion retain their allegiance to the religion into their elder years.[236] When asked about their ideology, the largest proportion of Satanists identified as apolitical or non-aligned, while only a small percentage identified as conservative.[237] A small minority of Satanists expressed support for Nazism; conversely, over two-thirds expressed opposition or strong opposition to it.[223]

2021 Canadian census

The 2021 Canadian census states that 5,890 Canadians identify as Satanist, representing 0.02% of the population.[238]

Compared to the general population, Satanists are more likely to be male, aged in their 20s or 30s, and not a member of any recognized minority group, although the Japanese are an exception (with the Japanese comprising 0.3% of both Satanists and the population as a whole).

Comparison of Satanists in Canada against the general population[238]
General population Satanists
Total population 36,328,480 5,890
Gender Male 17,937,165 (49.4%) 3,430 (58.2%)
Female 18,391,315 (50.6%) 2,460 (41.8%)
Age 0 to 14 5,992,555 (16.5%) 175 (3%)
15 to 19 2,003,200 (5.5%) 210 (3.6%)
20 to 24 2,177,860 (6%) 810 (13.8%)
25 to 34 4,898,625 (13.5%) 2,755 (46.8%)
35 to 44 4,872,425 (13.4%) 1,250 (21.2%)
45 to 54 4,634,850 (12.8%) 470 (8%)
55 to 64 5,162,365 (14.2%) 165 (2.8%)
65 and over 6,586,600 (18.1%) 60 (1%)
Minority status Non-minority 26,689,275 (73.5%) 5,480 (93%)
South Asian 2,571,400 (7%) 40 (0.7%)
Chinese 1,715,770 (4.7%) 50 (0.9%)
Black 1,547,870 (4.3%) 100 (1.7%)
Filipino 957,355 (2.6%) 35 (0.6%)
Arab 694,015 (1.9%) 25 (0.4%)
Latin American 580,235 (1.6%) 55 (0.9%)
Southeast Asian 390,340 (1.1%) 20 (0.3%)
West Asian 360,495 (1%) 0 (0%)
Korean 218,140 (0.6%) 0 (0%)
Japanese 98,890 (0.3%) 15 (0.3%)
Visible minority, n.i.e. 172,885 (0.5%) 20 (0.3%)
Multiple visible minorities 331,805 (0.9%) 50 (0.8%)

Legal recognition

In 2004, it was claimed that Satanism was allowed in the Royal Navy of the British Armed Forces, despite opposition from Christians.[239][240][241] In 2016, under a Freedom of Information request, the Navy Command Headquarters stated that "we do not recognise satanism as a formal religion, and will not grant facilities or make specific time available for individual 'worship'."[242]

In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States debated in the case of Cutter v. Wilkinson over protecting minority religious rights of prison inmates after a lawsuit challenging the issue was filed to them.[243][244] The court ruled that facilities that accept federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations that are necessary to engage in activities for the practice of their own religious beliefs.[245][246]

In 2019, The Satanic Temple was granted religious IRS 501(c)(3) status.[247]



Satan in Paradise Lost, as illustrated by Gustave Doré

From the late 1600s through to the 1800s, the character of Satan was increasingly rendered unimportant in western philosophy, and ignored in Christian theology, while in folklore he came to be seen as a foolish rather than a menacing figure.[248] The development of new values in the Age of Enlightenment (in particular, those of reason and individualism) contributed to a shift in many Europeans' concept of Satan.[248] In this context, a number of individuals took Satan out of the traditional Christian narrative and reread and reinterpreted him in light of their own time and their own interests, in turn generating new and different portraits of Satan.[249]

The shifting concept of Satan owes many of its origins to John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost (1667), in which Satan features as the protagonist.[250] Milton was a Puritan and had never intended for his depiction of Satan to be a sympathetic one.[251] However, in portraying Satan as a victim of his own pride who rebelled against the Judeo-Christian god, Milton humanized him and also allowed him to be interpreted as a rebel against tyranny.[252] This was how Milton's Satan was understood by John Dryden[253] and later readers like the publisher Joseph Johnson,[254] and the anarchist philosopher William Godwin, who reflected it in his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.[252] Paradise Lost gained a wide readership in the eighteenth century, both in Britain and in continental Europe, where it had been translated into French by Voltaire.[255] Milton thus became "a central character in rewriting Satanism" and would be viewed by many later religious Satanists as a "de facto Satanist".[249]

The nineteenth century saw the emergence of what has been termed "literary Satanism" or "romantic Satanism".[256] According to Ruben van Luijk, this cannot be seen as a "coherent movement with a single voice, but rather as a post factum identified group of sometimes widely divergent authors among whom a similar theme is found".[257] For the literary Satanists, Satan was depicted as a benevolent and sometimes heroic figure,[258] with these more sympathetic portrayals proliferating in the art and poetry of many romanticist and decadent figures.[249] For these individuals, Satanism was not a religious belief or ritual activity, but rather a "strategic use of a symbol and a character as part of artistic and political expression".[259]

Among the romanticist poets to adopt this concept of Satan was the English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, who had been influenced by Milton.[260] In his poem Laon and Cythna, Shelley praised the "serpent", a reference to Satan, as a force for good in the universe.[261] Another was Shelley's fellow British poet Lord Byron, who included Satanic themes in his 1821 play Cain, which was a dramatization of the Biblical story of Cain and Abel.[256] These more positive portrayals also developed in France; one example was the 1823 work Eloa by Alfred de Vigny.[262] Satan was also adopted by the French poet Victor Hugo, who made the character's fall from Heaven a central aspect of his La Fin de Satan, in which he outlined his own cosmogony.[263] Although the likes of Shelley and Byron promoted a positive image of Satan in their work, there is no evidence that any of them performed religious rites to venerate him, and thus they cannot be considered to be religious Satanists.[257]

Radical left-wing political ideas had been spread by the American Revolution of 1775–83 and the French Revolution of 1789–99. The figure of Satan, who was seen as having rebelled against the tyranny imposed by Jehovah, was appealing to many of the radical leftists of the period.[264] For them, Satan was "a symbol for the struggle against tyranny, injustice, and oppression... a mythical figure of rebellion for an age of revolutions, a larger-than-life individual for an age of individualism, a free thinker in an age struggling for free thought".[259] The French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who was a staunch critic of Christianity, embraced Satan as a symbol of liberty in several of his writings.[265] Another prominent 19th century anarchist, the Russian Mikhail Bakunin, similarly described the figure of Satan as "the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds" in his book God and the State.[266] These ideas likely inspired the American feminist activist Moses Harman to name his anarchist periodical Lucifer the Lightbearer.[267] The idea of this "Leftist Satan" declined during the twentieth century,[267] although it was used on occasion by authorities within the Soviet Union, who portrayed Satan as a symbol of freedom and equality.[268]

Metal and rock music

Heavy metal singer King Diamond is a member of the Church of Satan.

During the 1960s and 1970s, several rock bands— namely the American band Coven and the British band Black Widow, employed the imagery of Satanism and witchcraft in their work.[269] References to Satan also appeared in the work of those rock bands which were pioneering the heavy metal genre in Britain during the 1970s.[270] For example, the band Black Sabbath made mention of Satan in their lyrics, although some of the band's members were practicing Christians, and other lyrics affirmed the power of the Christian god over Satan.[271] In the 1980s, greater use of Satanic imagery was made by heavy metal bands like Slayer, Kreator, Sodom, and Destruction.[272] Bands active in the subgenre of death metal— among them Deicide, Morbid Angel, and Entombed, also adopted Satanic imagery, combining it with other morbid and dark imagery, such as that of zombies and serial killers.[273]

Satanism would come to be more closely associated with the subgenre of black metal,[270] in which it was foregrounded over the other themes that had been used in death metal.[274] A number of black metal performers incorporated self-injury into their act, framing this as a manifestation of Satanic devotion.[274] The first black metal band, Venom, proclaimed themselves to be Satanists, although this was more an act of provocation than an expression of genuine devotion to the Devil.[275] Satanic themes were also used by the black metal bands Bathory and Hellhammer.[276] However, the first black metal act to more seriously adopt Satanism was Mercyful Fate, whose vocalist, King Diamond, joined the Church of Satan.[277] More often than not musicians associating themselves with black metal say they do not believe in legitimate Satanic ideology and often profess to being atheists, agnostics, or religious skeptics.[278]

In contrast to King Diamond, various black metal Satanists sought to distance themselves from LaVeyan Satanism, for instance by referring to their beliefs as "devil worship".[279] These individuals regarded Satan as a literal entity,[280] and in contrast to Anton LaVey, they associated Satanism with criminality, suicide, and terror.[279] For them, Christianity was regarded as a plague which required eradication.[281] Many of these individuals, most prominently Varg Vikernes and Euronymous, were involved in the early Norwegian black metal scene.[282][283] Between 1992 and 1996, such people destroyed around fifty Norwegian churches in arson attacks.[284] Within the black metal scene, a number of musicians later replaced Satanic themes with those deriving from Heathenry, a form of modern Paganism.[285]

See also



  1. ^ a b c Abrams, Joe (Spring 2006). Wyman, Kelly (ed.). "The Religious Movements Homepage Project - Satanism: An Introduction". University of Virginia. Archived from the original on 2006-08-29. Retrieved 2021-01-01.
  2. ^ Gilmore, Peter. "Science and Satanism". Point of Inquiry Interview. Retrieved 2013-12-09.
  3. ^ TST. "New milestone: over 700,000 members!". TST. Retrieved 2023-01-23.
  4. ^ a b Petersen 2009a.
  5. ^ Alisauskiene 2009.
  6. ^ "Satanism stalks Poland". BBC News. June 5, 2000.
  7. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 7.
  8. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 16.
  9. ^ Petersen 2012, p. 92.
  10. ^ Gallagher 2006, p. 151.
  11. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 3.
  12. ^ Medway 2001, p. 51; van Luijk 2016, p. 19.
  13. ^ Medway 2001, p. 51.
  14. ^ Medway 2001, p. 52.
  15. ^ Medway 2001, p. 53.
  16. ^ a b c Medway 2001, p. 9.
  17. ^ a b Medway 2001, p. 257; van Luijk 2016, p. 2.
  18. ^ a b c d van Luijk 2016, p. 2.
  19. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 44.
  20. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 13–14.
  21. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 14.
  22. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 16.
  23. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 15.
  24. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 19.
  25. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 20.
  26. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 18.
  27. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 21.
  28. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 21–22.
  29. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 23.
  30. ^ a b van Luijk 2016, p. 24.
  31. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 24–26.
  32. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 25–26.
  33. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 25.
  34. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 28.
  35. ^ Medway 2001, p. 126.
  36. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 28–29.
  37. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 29–31.
  38. ^ Medway 2001, p. 57.
  39. ^ Medway 2001, p. 58.
  40. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 57–58.
  41. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 60–63.
  42. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 35.
  43. ^ a b c van Luijk 2016, p. 36.
  44. ^ Medway 2001, p. 133; van Luijk 2016, p. 37.
  45. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 38.
  46. ^ Medway 2001, p. 70.
  47. ^ Scarre & Callow 2001, p. 2.
  48. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 44–45.
  49. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 58–59; van Luijk 2016, p. 66.
  50. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 66–67.
  51. ^ a b van Luijk 2016, p. 66.
  52. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 60–61.
  53. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 71.
  54. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 71–73.
  55. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 74–78.
  56. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 84–85.
  57. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 85–86.
  58. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 266–267.
  59. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 141–142.
  60. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 143–149.
  61. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 159–161.
  62. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 164–170.
  63. ^ Medway 2001, p. 161.
  64. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 262–263; Introvigne 2016, p. 66.
  65. ^ Petersen 2005, pp. 444–446.
  66. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 107.
  67. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 37.
  68. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 37–38.
  69. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 38.
  70. ^ Lewis, James R. (March 2001). The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions - Google Books. Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781615927388. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  71. ^ Temple, Ruth Zabriskie (May 24, 2008). Modern British Literature - Ruth Zabriskie Temple - Google Books. F. Ungar Publishing Company. ISBN 9780804431408. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  72. ^ Wexler, Jay (June 11, 2019). Our Non-Christian Nation: How Atheists, Satanists, Pagans, and Others Are ... - Jay Wexler - Google Books. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9781503609068. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  73. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 36.
  74. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 39.
  75. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 227.
  76. ^ Hutton 1999, p. 175; Dyrendal 2012, pp. 369–370.
  77. ^ Hutton 1999, p. 175.
  78. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 42.
  79. ^ a b c Medway 2001, p. 18.
  80. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 43–44.
  81. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 45.
  82. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 277.
  83. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 49–50.
  84. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 278.
  85. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 280.
  86. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 50.
  87. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 46.
  88. ^ a b La Fontaine 2016, p. 13.
  89. ^ a b La Fontaine 2016, p. 15.
  90. ^ La Fontaine 2016, p. 13; Introvigne 2016, p. 381.
  91. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 372.
  92. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 175–177; Introvigne 2016, pp. 374–376.
  93. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 115–116.
  94. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 178–183; Introvigne 2016, pp. 405–406.
  95. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 116–120.
  96. ^ Medway 2001, p. 183.
  97. ^ La Fontaine 2016, p. 16.
  98. ^ Medway 2001, p. 369; La Fontaine 2016, p. 15.
  99. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 191–195.
  100. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 220–221.
  101. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 234–248.
  102. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 210–211.
  103. ^ a b Medway 2001, p. 213.
  104. ^ Medway 2001, p. 249.
  105. ^ La Fontaine 2016, pp. 13–14.
  106. ^ Medway 2001, p. 118; La Fontaine 2016, p. 14.
  107. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 456.
  108. ^ Petersen 2009, p. 91.
  109. ^ a b Dyrendal 2013, p. 129.
  110. ^ Lap 2013, p. 92.
  111. ^ Maxwell-Stuart 2011, p. 198.
  112. ^ Lap 2013, p. 94.
  113. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 288; Schipper 2010, p. 107.
  114. ^ La Fontaine 1999, p. 97.
  115. ^ Lewis 2001, p. 5.
  116. ^ Asprem & Granholm 2014, p. 75.
  117. ^ a b Lewis 2002, p. 5.
  118. ^ Faxneld & Petersen 2013, p. 81.
  119. ^ Lewis 2003, p. 116.
  120. ^ Lewis 2003, p. 105.
  121. ^ Petersen 2013, p. 232,[verification needed].
  122. ^ Lap 2013, p. 85.
  123. ^ Bromley 2005, pp. 8127–8128.
  124. ^ Gallagher 2005, p. 6530.
  125. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 290; Partridge 2004, p. 82; Petersen 2009, pp. 224–225; Schipper 2010, p. 108; Faxneld & Petersen 2013, p. 79.
  126. ^ Lap 2013, p. 84.
  127. ^ a b c La Fontaine 1999, p. 96.
  128. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 70.
  129. ^ Lewis 2002, p. 2.
  130. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 288.
  131. ^ Drury 2003, p. 188.
  132. ^ Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 528.
  133. ^ La Fontaine 1999, p. 99.
  134. ^ Petersen 2009a, p. 9.
  135. ^ Lewis 2001, p. 330.
  136. ^ Warman-Stallings, Kelly (2012). Who's? Right: Mankind, Religions & The End Times. Authorhouse. p. 35.[self-published source]
  137. ^ a b Schipper 2010, p. 109.
  138. ^ a b Faxneld & Petersen 2013, p. 80.
  139. ^ Lewis 2001b, p. 50.
  140. ^ Lewis & Petersen 2014, p. 408.
  141. ^ Wright 1993, p. 143.
  142. ^ Cavaglion & Sela-Shayovitz 2005, p. 255.
  143. ^ LaVey 2005, pp. 44–45.
  144. ^ High Priest, Magus Peter H. Gilmore. "Satanism: The Feared Religion".
  145. ^ The Church of Satan [History Channel]. YouTube. January 12, 2012. Archived from the original on 2015-07-20.
  146. ^ High Priest, Magus Peter H. Gilmore. "F.A.Q. Fundamental Beliefs".
  147. ^ Ohlheiser, Abby (November 7, 2014). "The Church of Satan wants you to stop calling these 'devil worshiping' alleged murderers Satanists". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
  148. ^ Massoud Hayoun (December 8, 2013). "Group aims to put 'Satanist' monument near Oklahoma capitol | Al Jazeera America". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
  149. ^ "Satanists petition to build monument on Oklahoma state capitol grounds | Washington Times Communities". The Washington Times. December 9, 2013. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
  150. ^ a b Bugbee, Shane (July 30, 2013). "Unmasking Lucien Greaves, Leader of the Satanic Temple | VICE United States". Retrieved 2014-03-25.
  151. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 219.
  152. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 220.
  153. ^ Oppenheimer, Mark (July 10, 2015). "A Mischievous Thorn in the Side of Conservative Christianity". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-07-11.
  154. ^ "FAQ". TST. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
  155. ^ "What does Satan mean to the Satanic Temple? - CNN". CNN. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
  156. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 3.
  157. ^ "The Nazi Satanists promoting extreme violence and terrorism".
  158. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 4.
  159. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 3; Introvigne 2016, p. 517.
  160. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 7–9.
  161. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 5.
  162. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 6.
  163. ^ Partridge, Christopher (2004). The Re-Enchantment of the West: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture. Vol. 1. London: T&T Clark. p. 82. ISBN 0-567-08269-5.
  164. ^ a b Spence, L. (1993). An Encyclopedia of Occultism. Carol Publishing.
  165. ^ Michelle Belanger (2007). Vampires in Their Own Words: An Anthology of Vampire Voices. Llewellyn Worldwide. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-7387-1220-8.
  166. ^ a b Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 218; Senholt 2013, p. 256.
  167. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 218; Senholt 2013, p. 256; Monette 2013, p. 87.
  168. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 216; Senholt 2013, p. 268; Faxneld 2013, p. 207.
  169. ^ Ryan 2003, p. 53; Senholt 2013, p. 267.
  170. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 293.
  171. ^ a b Senholt 2013, p. 256.
  172. ^ Monette 2013, p. 107.
  173. ^ Kaplan 2000, p. 236.
  174. ^ a b c Monette 2013, p. 88.
  175. ^ Faxneld 2013, p. 207; Faxneld 2014, p. 88; Senholt 2013, p. 250; Sieg 2013, p. 252.
  176. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2003, pp. 218–219; Baddeley 2010, p. 155.
  177. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 219.
  178. ^ Kaplan 2000, p. 237; Ryan 2003, p. 54.
  179. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 292; Kaplan 2000, p. 237.
  180. ^ Monette 2013, p. 114.
  181. ^ Faxneld 2013, p. 207.
  182. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 292.
  183. ^ "A Nazi-satanist cult is fuelling far-right groups", New Statesman, 4 March 2020.
  184. ^
  185. ^ "Order of Nine Angles". Counter Extremism Project. One piece of propaganda the group produced is called The Rape Anthology, a collection of ONA writings praising Hitler, Satan, and rape, while employing Islamic terminology and demonizing Jews and minorities. Some of the essays suggest that rape is necessary for the ascension of the Ubermensch.
  186. ^ "'Random' Murder of Muslim Man Linked to 'Neo-Nazi Death Cult': Report". September 30, 2020.
  187. ^ Aquino, Michael (2002). Church of Satan (PDF). San Francisco: Temple of Set. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-12.
  188. ^ a b Harvey 2009.
  189. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 390.
  190. ^ Petersen 2005, p. 436; Harvey 2009, p. 32.
  191. ^ Granholm 2009, pp. 93–94; Granholm 2013, p. 218.
  192. ^ La Fontaine 1999, p. 102; Gardell 2003, p. 291; Petersen 2005, p. 436.
  193. ^ Granholm 2009, p. 94.
  194. ^ Faxneld & Petersen 2013a, p. 7.
  195. ^ Petersen 2005, p. 435.
  196. ^ Granholm 2009, p. 93; Granholm 2013, p. 223.
  197. ^ Asprem & Granholm 2014, pp. 144–146.
  198. ^ a b c d e Introvigne, Massimo (April 13, 2017). "Satan the Prophet: A History of Modern Satanism" (PDF). CESNUR. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  199. ^ a b Petersen, Jesper (August 27–29, 2012). "Bracketing Beelzebub: Satanism studies and/as boundary work". ContERN. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  200. ^ a b c d e Introvigne 2016, pp. 370–371.
  201. ^ a b c d e f Twilight, Jennifer (January 25, 2021). "Analysis on the Joy of Satan". Italian Satanist Union. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  202. ^ a b c d McBride, Jaemes (2013). The Divine Province: Birthing New Earth. Ed Rychkun. p. 84. ISBN 978-1927066034.
  203. ^ a b c ATLANTA, J.F. (January 9, 2014). "What do Satanists believe?". The Economist. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  204. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 144–232.
  205. ^ Paniccia, Enrico (January 17, 2021). "The dark side of Christianity". Consul Press. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  206. ^ "Satanism". HISTORY. September 27, 2019. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  207. ^ Petersen, Jesper (2011). Between Darwin and the Devil: Modern Satanism as Discourse, Milieu, and Self. NTNU-trykk. pp. 218–219, 144–146. ISBN 978-82-471-3052-0.
  208. ^ Holt, Cimminnee (August 2012). Satanists and Scholars: A Historiographic Overview and Critique of Scholarship on Religious Satanism (PDF) (Thesis). p. 87 – via Spectrum Library.
  209. ^ Medway 2001, pp. 362–365.
  210. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 130.
  211. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 445.
  212. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 446.
  213. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 122.
  214. ^ Breskin, David (November 22, 1984). "Cult Killing: Kids in the Dark". Rolling Stone.
  215. ^ "IL 18.3.1999: Saatananpalvojat söivät osan uhristaan" (in Finnish). Iltalehti. Archived from the original on 2016-10-21. Retrieved 2020-09-22.
  216. ^ "Russian Satanist Jailed for Ritual Murders Released After Fighting in Ukraine". The Moscow Times. November 21, 2023.
  217. ^ Lewis, James. Encyclopedia of Satanism. ISBN 9781312360211.
  218. ^ a b Lewis, James R. (August 2001b). "Who Serves Satan? A Demographic and Ideological Profile". Marburg Journal of Religion. University of Marburg. 6 (2): 1–25. doi:10.17192/mjr.2001.6.3748. ISSN 1612-2941. Retrieved 2020-12-30.
  219. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 138.
  220. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 158.
  221. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 146.
  222. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 142.
  223. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 143.
  224. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 202–204.
  225. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 200–201.
  226. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 179–180.
  227. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 525–527.
  228. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 181–182.
  229. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 183.
  230. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 209.
  231. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 210–212.
  232. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 151, 153.
  233. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 153.
  234. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 157.
  235. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 159.
  236. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 160.
  237. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 171.
  238. ^ a b Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (October 26, 2022). "Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts". Retrieved 2022-12-31.
  239. ^ Royal Navy to allow devil worship CNN
  240. ^ Carter, Helen. The devil and the deep blue sea: Navy gives blessing to sailor Satanist. The Guardian
  241. ^ Navy approves first ever Satanist BBC News
  242. ^ Ministry of Defence Request for Information. Navy Command FOI Section, 7 January 2016.
  243. ^ Linda Greenhouse (March 22, 2005). "Inmates Who Follow Satanism and Wicca Find Unlikely Ally". The New York Times.
  244. ^ "Before high court: law that allows for religious rights". The Christian Science Monitor. March 21, 2005.
  245. ^ Johnson, M. Alex (May 31, 2005). "Court upholds prisoners' religious rights". MSNBC. Retrieved 2016-08-26.
  246. ^ "Cutter v. Wilkinson 544 U.S. 709 (2005)". Oyez. Retrieved 2013-10-07.
  247. ^ "The Satanic Temple is a real religion, says IRS". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 2023-01-23.
  248. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 29.
  249. ^ a b c Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 28.
  250. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 28; van Luijk 2016, p. 70.
  251. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 28, 30.
  252. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 30.
  253. ^ Manuel, M. (July 23, 2010). "Seventeenth-century Critics and Biographers of Milton - M. Manuel - Google Books". Retrieved 2022-10-08.
  254. ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 28, 30; van Luijk 2016, pp. 69–70.
  255. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 70.
  256. ^ a b van Luijk 2016, p. 73.
  257. ^ a b van Luijk 2016, p. 108.
  258. ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 69.
  259. ^ a b Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 31.
  260. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 71–72.
  261. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 97–98.
  262. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 74–75.
  263. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 105–107.
  264. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 77–79.
  265. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 117–119.
  266. ^ van Luijk 2016, pp. 119–120.
  267. ^ a b van Luijk 2016, p. 120.
  268. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 66.
  269. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 462–463.
  270. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 467.
  271. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 467–468.
  272. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 468.
  273. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 468–469.
  274. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 469.
  275. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 470.
  276. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 472–473.
  277. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 471.
  278. ^ "Death to False Satanism | NOISEY". NOISEY. October 29, 2014. Retrieved 2016-03-08.
  279. ^ a b Introvigne 2016, p. 480.
  280. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 479.
  281. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 482.
  282. ^ Dyrendal 2016, pp. 481–488.
  283. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 479–481.
  284. ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 481.
  285. ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 503–504.


Further reading

External links